Die täterbelastende strafrechtliche Rechtsprechungsänderung und das Rückwirkungsverbot: Versuch einer Austarierung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Präzisierungspflicht: 459
Uitgelicht
|
79,90 |
Naar shop
|
|
79,90 |
Naar shop
|
|
79,99 |
Naar shop
|
| VERGELIJK ALLE AANBIEDERS (3) | ||
Beschrijving
Bol
'Change in Precedent to the Disadvantage of the Defendant in a Criminal Case and the Principle of Non-Retroactivity. Attempt of a Specification with Special Respect to the ¿obligation to specify¿': The so-called ¿obligation to specify¿ by the German Federal Constitutional Court fueled support for a higher level of protection for the defendant in case of a change in precedent. The work at hand examines this issue. One conclusion is that the solution currently practiced by courts needs to be changed. An objective approach, which is necessary, should be based on Art. 103 II GG. This solution is specified for its practical use and applied to five cases of changes in precedent illustratively.
Beschrijving
(1)
'Change in Precedent to the Disadvantage of the Defendant in a Criminal Case and the Principle of Non-Retroactivity. Attempt of a Specification with Special Respect to the ¿obligation to specify¿': The so-called ¿obligation to specify¿ by the German Federal Constitutional Court fueled support for a higher level of protection for the defendant in case of a change in precedent. The work at hand examines this issue. One conclusion is that the solution currently practiced by courts needs to be changed. An objective approach, which is necessary, should be based on Art. 103 II GG. This solution is specified for its practical use and applied to five cases of changes in precedent illustratively.
Productspecificaties
Prijshistorie
* Prijshistorie bevat geen data van Amazon, Amazon Marketplace.
Prijzen voor het laatst bijgewerkt op:
Gerelateerde resultaten
