Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Eine nicht-punitive Welt durch Technik?: Strafrechtsbegrenzungsdiskussion am Beispiel der Legitimation des Arzneimittelfälschungsstrafrechts in einer ... Präventionsgesellschaft: 338

Name: Eine nicht-punitive Welt durch Technik?: Strafrechtsbegrenzungsdiskussion am Beispiel der Legitimation des Arzneimittelfälschungsstrafrechts in einer ... Präventionsgesellschaft: 338
Brand: Duncker & Humblot GmbH
SKU: e6cedaa7e13370be78a9a10568a5b63a

1/1

Afbeelding van Eine nicht-punitive Welt durch Technik?: Strafrechtsbegrenzungsdiskussion am Beispiel der Legitimation des Arzneimittelfälschungsstrafrechts in einer ... Präventionsgesellschaft: 338

Bol

Prijzen vanaf

139,00

Uitgelicht

	139,00	Naar shop
	139,90	Naar shop
	139,90	Naar shop
VERGELIJK ALLE AANBIEDERS (3)

Beschrijving

Bol 'A Non-Punitive World through Technology? Discussion on the Limitation of Criminal Law using the Example of the Legitimacy of Criminal Law on Counterfeit Medicines in an Increasingly Technical and Digital Prevention Society': Schneider asks whether techno-digital prevention calls into question the legitimacy of criminal law in falsified-medicines control. Using the secured legal supply chain (serialization, verification)) against illicit channels (darknet, illicit pharmacies), he tests erosion of the law-technology complementarity. Through norm theory and penal theory, proportionality analysis and a thought experiment, he argues for restrained penal use, robust technical safeguards, and stronger prosecution.

Lees meer

Vergelijk aanbieders (3)

Sorteren op:

€ 139,00 Gratis verzending

€ 139,90 Gratis verzending

Beschrijving (1)

'A Non-Punitive World through Technology? Discussion on the Limitation of Criminal Law using the Example of the Legitimacy of Criminal Law on Counterfeit Medicines in an Increasingly Technical and Digital Prevention Society': Schneider asks whether techno-digital prevention calls into question the legitimacy of criminal law in falsified-medicines control. Using the secured legal supply chain (serialization, verification)) against illicit channels (darknet, illicit pharmacies), he tests erosion of the law-technology complementarity. Through norm theory and penal theory, proportionality analysis and a thought experiment, he argues for restrained penal use, robust technical safeguards, and stronger prosecution.

Lees meer