Myth and Neomyth: The Methodology of Scientific Philosophical Verification Narratives

Myth and Neomyth are conceived and constructed within corresponding narratives for the purpose of a special examination of a complex of problems, the nature of the future, meaning, the consequences of thought, the "factory," metaphysics, indestructibility, the cyclical nature of Evil, based on the methods of deconstruction, symbolization, semanticization, conceptualization, sacralization, and philosophization. The primary approach to this development was, first, a movement from Myth to Logos and vice versa, and, second, a movement from literary philosophy to rational philosophy and vice versa, ultimately closing the circle to form a complete philosophy. The book asserts that Nature knows the cause but not the purpose, and therefore good and evil are nothing but sunlight. In this regard, humanity's ontological insufficiency serves as a breeding ground for Evil. How can this insufficiency be overcome? The Jungian model of evil in the shadow is always present. Meanwhile, as is well known, the future casts its shadow long before it arrives. And can knowledge apply a universal system against Evil? Meanwhile, "where the light is brightest, the shadows are deepest." People have different attitudes toward power, intuition, common sense, abstract imagination, talent, and insight.