Schadensersatz statt der Eigentumsvormerkung?: Die (Un )Anwendbarkeit des Schadensersatzanspruches Leistung (§§ 280 Abs. 1, 3, 281 BGB) ... den Dritterwerber (§ 888 1 BGB): 602

'Compensation Instead of Priority Notice? The (In)Applicability of the Claim for Compensation Instead of Performance (§§ 280 para. 1, para. 3, 281 German Civil Code) to the Consent Claim of the Person Entitled to Priority Notice Against the Third-Party Acquirer (§ 888 para. 1 German Civil Code)': The author offers an answer to the question of whether the person entitled to priority notice can monetize the claim under § 888 para. 1 German Civil Code instead of enforcing it. The application can be constructed by treating the demand for compensation as an approval of the disposition contrary to the priority notice. However, the claim for compensation does not match the interests underlying the legal relationship between the person entitled to priority notice and the third-party acquirer.