the Argument of Supererogation and Limits Duty in Applied Ethics

Prijzen vanaf
90,94

Uitgelicht

VERGELIJK ALLE AANBIEDERS (3)

Beschrijving

Bol Drawing on current research, this book demonstrates that there are rational reasons for why certain actions should reasonably not be considered duties despite their moral value. It is of interest to students and scholars of moral philosophy, applied ethics and meta ethics. Drawing on current research, this book demonstrates that there are rational reasons for why certain actions should reasonably not be considered duties despite their moral value. Would you do something unpleasant or dangerous you are not obliged to, simply because it would benefit others? “I won't do this because I don't have to”. This argument of supererogation can be used to reject overly demanding moral expectations. Yet, the argument is not always equally convincing. For instance, refusing to donate a kidney is morally accepted. Refusing a favor to a friend, however, seems indecent. Perhaps supererogatory acts do not exist at all? This book offers a refined framework for understanding the boundaries of moral duty. It is of interest to students and scholars of moral philosophy, applied ethics and meta ethics. The translation was done with the help of artificial intelligence. A subsequent human revision was done primarily in terms of content. Drawing on current research, this book demonstrates that there are rational reasons for why certain actions should reasonably not be considered duties despite their moral value. Would you do something unpleasant or dangerous you are not obliged to, simply because it would benefit others? “I won't do this because I don't have to”. This argument of supererogation can be used to reject overly demanding moral expectations. Yet, the argument is not always equally convincing. For instance, refusing to donate a kidney is morally accepted. Refusing a favor to a friend, however, seems indecent. Perhaps supererogatory acts do not exist at all? This book offers a refined framework for understanding the boundaries of moral duty. It is of interest to students and scholars of moral philosophy, applied ethics and meta ethics.

Vergelijk aanbieders (3)

Shop
Prijs
Verzendkosten
Totale prijs
90,94
Gratis
90,94
Naar shop
Gratis Shipping Costs
90,94
Gratis
90,94
Naar shop
Gratis Shipping Costs
90,99
Gratis
90,99
Naar shop
Gratis Shipping Costs
Beschrijving (2)
Bol

Drawing on current research, this book demonstrates that there are rational reasons for why certain actions should reasonably not be considered duties despite their moral value. It is of interest to students and scholars of moral philosophy, applied ethics and meta ethics. Drawing on current research, this book demonstrates that there are rational reasons for why certain actions should reasonably not be considered duties despite their moral value. Would you do something unpleasant or dangerous you are not obliged to, simply because it would benefit others? “I won't do this because I don't have to”. This argument of supererogation can be used to reject overly demanding moral expectations. Yet, the argument is not always equally convincing. For instance, refusing to donate a kidney is morally accepted. Refusing a favor to a friend, however, seems indecent. Perhaps supererogatory acts do not exist at all? This book offers a refined framework for understanding the boundaries of moral duty. It is of interest to students and scholars of moral philosophy, applied ethics and meta ethics. The translation was done with the help of artificial intelligence. A subsequent human revision was done primarily in terms of content. Drawing on current research, this book demonstrates that there are rational reasons for why certain actions should reasonably not be considered duties despite their moral value. Would you do something unpleasant or dangerous you are not obliged to, simply because it would benefit others? “I won't do this because I don't have to”. This argument of supererogation can be used to reject overly demanding moral expectations. Yet, the argument is not always equally convincing. For instance, refusing to donate a kidney is morally accepted. Refusing a favor to a friend, however, seems indecent. Perhaps supererogatory acts do not exist at all? This book offers a refined framework for understanding the boundaries of moral duty. It is of interest to students and scholars of moral philosophy, applied ethics and meta ethics.

Amazon

Pagina's: 332, Paperback, Palgrave Macmillan


Productspecificaties

Merk Macmillan
EAN
  • 9783662719152
Maat


Prijshistorie

* Prijshistorie bevat geen data van Amazon, Amazon Marketplace.

Prijzen voor het laatst bijgewerkt op:

Uitgelichte Keuze
90,94
Naar shop