The Modern Problem of Political Sovereignty
Prijzen vanaf
VERGELIJK ALLE AANBIEDERS
(3)
Bol
Both G.F.W. Hegel and Carl Schmitt took seriously the problem of political sovereignty. While Schmitt rejected liberal political theories that argue for the immediate unity of democracy and legality, Hegel claimed that the constitutional monarchy can maintain the division of the powers and their unity. Feseha argues that Hegel’s conception of the division of powers deserves attention by contemporary states to solve today’s issues.
Lees meer
83,56
Uitgelicht
|
83,56 |
Naar shop
|
|
83,56 |
Naar shop
|
|
106,47 |
Naar shop
|
Beschrijving
Bol
Both G.F.W. Hegel and Carl Schmitt took seriously the problem of political sovereignty. While Schmitt rejected liberal political theories that argue for the immediate unity of democracy and legality, Hegel claimed that the constitutional monarchy can maintain the division of the powers and their unity. Feseha argues that Hegel’s conception of the division of powers deserves attention by contemporary states to solve today’s issues.
Bol
Both G.F.W. Hegel and Carl Schmitt took seriously the problem of political sovereignty. While Schmitt rejected liberal political theories that argue for the immediate unity of democracy and legality, Hegel claimed that the constitutional monarchy can maintain the division of the powers and their unity. Feseha argues that Hegel’s conception of the division of powers deserves attention by contemporary states to solve today’s issues.
AmazonPagina's: 180, Editie: Eerste editie, Hardcover, De Gruyter
Prijshistorie
* Prijshistorie bevat geen data van Amazon, Amazon Marketplace.
Prijzen voor het laatst bijgewerkt op: