Reading Between the Lines
Beschrijving
Bol Partner
For those exhausted by the highly charged debates and polarized climate of literary studies today, Annabel Pattersons Reading Between the Lines offers a strategic compromise: a moderate stance between the radical opponents and the zealous protectors of the traditional Western canon. She reconsiders the value of reading the white, male, canonical writers of antiquity and of early modern England, finding in them a set of values different from those supposed by both sides in the Great Books quarrel. Rather than being the unthinking or deliberate promoters of political or cultural uniformity, these writers subjected such conventional notions to critical scrutiny and even promoted alternatives. The key to this revisionary argument is reading between the lines, a strategy usually associated with the eccentric conservativism of Leo Strauss, but which, Patterson shows, is not only implicit in all acts of interpretation, but played a particularly important role in an age when writing between the lines was often essential for the writers survival. Patterson argues that, if we learn how to read those old and seemingly alien texts, which themselves responded to rapid and unsettling change in the arenas of religion, politics, and education, they have much that is liberating to tell us about our own expanding culture, including the importance of republican constitutionalism, freedom of speech, and civic and religious toleration. This salutary redefinition of humanism arises from Pattersons essays on Plato, Spenser, Shakespeare, Donne, and Milton; but the book also deals with the gendered topics of rape and divorce and with popular culture in the sixteenth century and today. These interests are not on opposite sides of some theoretical boundary, but (as Patterson demonstrates from contemporary novels by Joseph Heller and Nancy Price) interdependent.
For those exhausted by the highly charged debates and polarized climate of literary studies today, Annabel Pattersons Reading Between the Lines offers a strategic compromise: a moderate stance between the radical opponents and the zealous protectors of the traditional Western canon. She reconsiders the value of reading the white, male, canonical writers of antiquity and of early modern England, finding in them a set of values different from those supposed by both sides in the Great Books quarrel. Rather than being the unthinking or deliberate promoters of political or cultural uniformity, these writers subjected such conventional notions to critical scrutiny and even promoted alternatives. The key to this revisionary argument is reading between the lines, a strategy usually associated with the eccentric conservativism of Leo Strauss, but which, Patterson shows, is not only implicit in all acts of interpretation, but played a particularly important role in an age when writing between the lines was often essential for the writers survival. Patterson argues that, if we learn how to read those old and seemingly alien texts, which themselves responded to rapid and unsettling change in the arenas of religion, politics, and education, they have much that is liberating to tell us about our own expanding culture, including the importance of republican constitutionalism, freedom of speech, and civic and religious toleration. This salutary redefinition of humanism arises from Pattersons essays on Plato, Spenser, Shakespeare, Donne, and Milton; but the book also deals with the gendered topics of rape and divorce and with popular culture in the sixteenth century and today. These interests are not on opposite sides of some theoretical boundary, but (as Patterson demonstrates from contemporary novels by Joseph Heller and Nancy Price) interdependent.
BolI came to work with spreadsheets and deadlines on my mind. Instead, I got caught with my e-reader full of office smut—by my boss himself. Mr. Nolan. Sharp jawline, deep voice, and eyes that saw right through me. I should’ve been fired on the spot. But instead… he told me to stay late. To bring the device. To read the story out loud. What started as a risky fantasy quickly spiraled into a real-life scene straight from my dirty little e-book—the powerful boss, the eager secretary, the desk that witnessed it all. The only question now is… when the next chapter starts, will I still be reading the fiction, or living it? A steamy, forbidden office romance filled with tension, power games, and all the things that shouldn’t happen after hours—but definitely do.
StumpelLaura Pool has been reading between the lines of life.To discover meaning, gain understanding and insight.Writing down what she has found between the lines, she is sharing her perspective in fifty five fragments.Every short story is accompanied by an illustration. Intuitively created by five different illustrators.
AmazonPagina's: 336, Hardcover, Quercus Publishing
Productspecificaties
Merk | Quercus Publishing |
---|---|
EAN |
|
Maat |
|
Prijshistorie
Prijzen voor het laatst bijgewerkt op: